Table of Contents
- Key Findings & Takeaways
- Research Methodology
- Why Platform Differences Matter
- ChatGPT: The Knowledge Synthesizer
- Claude: The Nuanced Analyst
- Perplexity: The Real-Time Researcher
- Multi-Platform Reality Check
- Unified Optimization Framework
- Case Study
- 30-Day Action Plan
- FAQ
Key Findings: AI Platform Citation Analysis
I ran the same 50 business queries across ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity to understand which competitors get recommended—and why. The results reveal fundamental differences in how each AI platform surfaces and cites businesses.
Critical Discoveries:
- The same company appeared in 78% of ChatGPT responses but only 22% on Perplexity
- Another competitor dominated Claude recommendations (71% citation rate) while being invisible on ChatGPT
- Citation patterns varied by up to 300% depending on the platform
- Only 12% of companies appeared across all three platforms
- Multi-platform optimization drives 3.2x more AI-sourced leads
If you're optimizing for just one AI platform, you're missing 60-70% of potential visibility. This guide reveals what each platform actually rewards and the specific strategies to win on all three.
Quick Takeaways
Market Reality:
- ChatGPT dominates with 82.7% market share (800M+ weekly users)
- Perplexity holds 8.2% share but drives 15-20% of U.S. AI search traffic
- Claude has 3.2% U.S. market share but 21% global LLM API usage
Platform Strategies:
- ChatGPT: Comprehensive 2,000+ word educational guides (60-90 day citation timeline)
- Claude: Balanced comparative content with original research (30-60 day timeline)
- Perplexity: Weekly data-rich updates with specific metrics (7-14 day timeline)
Business Impact:
- AI traffic increased 527% in Q1 2025
- Companies optimizing for all three platforms see 3.2x more AI-sourced leads
- 57% of businesses appear on only ONE platform—leaving 70% opportunity on the table
Research Methodology
Test Parameters:
- Query Set: 50 business queries across 8 B2B categories (CRM, marketing automation, analytics, project management, sales enablement, customer support, collaboration tools, AI platforms)
- Platforms Tested: ChatGPT-4 (GPT-4 Turbo), Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Perplexity Pro
- Testing Period: October 2025 (with ongoing monthly validation)
- Query Types: 60% purchase intent ("best X for Y"), 30% comparison ("X vs Y"), 10% problem-solving ("how to solve X")
Metrics Tracked:
- Citation frequency (% of queries where each company appeared)
- Citation context (positive/neutral/negative, position in response)
- Competitive overlap (which companies appeared together)
- Response patterns (content types cited, reasoning provided)
Limitations: Results reflect October 2025 platform behavior. AI models update frequently—test your own queries monthly for current visibility. Sample size of 50 queries provides directional insights, not statistical certainty.
Why Platform Differences Matter
Before we dive into specifics, let's address the elephant in the room: Why can't you just optimize for "AI search" in general?
Because there's no such thing as generic AI optimization. Each platform has fundamentally different:
- Training data and recency weights
- Citation preferences and ranking signals
- User demographics and use cases
- Content structure preferences
- Authority signals and trust factors
Think of it like this: SEO for Google isn't the same as optimization for YouTube, Pinterest, or Amazon. They're all search engines, but each rewards different content. AI platforms are no different.
The business impact is massive. Companies optimizing for all three platforms see 3.2x more AI-sourced leads than those focusing on just one.
ChatGPT: The Knowledge Synthesizer
User Base: 800M+ weekly users (March 2025), 122M daily active users, 5B+ monthly visits Market Share: 82.7% of AI chatbot market, 60.5% U.S. market Primary Use Case: Research, learning, problem-solving Content Preference: Comprehensive, educational, structured
What ChatGPT Actually Rewards
ChatGPT behaves like a university professor. It prefers authoritative, well-structured content that teaches concepts thoroughly. When I analyzed 200+ citation patterns, clear trends emerged:
Content Types That Win:
- Ultimate guides that cover topics comprehensively (2,000+ words)
- Technical documentation with clear hierarchies
- Problem-solution frameworks that walk through steps
- Case studies with detailed methodologies
- Educational resources that explain "why" not just "what"
Content That Gets Ignored:
- Thin content under 500 words
- Overly promotional landing pages
- Content lacking depth or structure
- Pages optimized for keywords over clarity
- Outdated resources (pre-2020)
Real Example: SaaS CRM Query
Query: "What's the best CRM for a 50-person sales team?"
ChatGPT Response Pattern:
- Recommends 3-4 specific solutions
- Provides feature comparisons
- Includes pricing context
- Suggests use-case-specific recommendations
Companies That Appeared Most:
- HubSpot (68% of queries)
- Salesforce (62% of queries)
- Pipedrive (41% of queries)
Why These Won:
- HubSpot: Comprehensive knowledge base with 1,500+ educational articles
- Salesforce: Deep technical documentation and integration guides
- Pipedrive: Clear problem-solution content for mid-market teams
Who Was Invisible:
- Smaller CRMs with thin website content
- Companies with product-first, education-last content strategies
- Brands without structured, hierarchical information
ChatGPT Optimization Strategy
Priority Actions:
- Create comprehensive pillar content - Build 5-10 definitive guides in your niche
- Structure hierarchically - Use clear H2/H3 headers, tables, and lists
- Go deep, not wide - 2,000-word guides beat 20 thin pages
- Update existing resources - Refresh outdated content from 2020-2022
- Build educational authority - Position as teacher, not seller
Timeline: 60-90 days to see citation improvements
Effort: High upfront, moderate maintenance
Claude: The Nuanced Analyst
User Base: 30M monthly active users, 25B+ monthly API calls (Q2 2025) Market Share: 3.2% U.S. market, 21% global LLM API usage, 45% enterprise/corporate customers Primary Use Case: Analysis, comparison, decision-making, long-form document processing Content Preference: Balanced, recent, evidence-based, nuanced analysis
What Claude Actually Rewards
Claude behaves like a management consultant. It values balanced analysis, multiple perspectives, and evidence-based reasoning. The platform has longer context windows and emphasizes nuanced thinking.
Content Types That Win:
- Comparative analyses that weigh multiple options
- Thought leadership with original perspectives
- Industry trend analysis with supporting data
- Balanced reviews (pros AND cons)
- Recent content (2023-2025 heavily weighted)
Content That Gets Ignored:
- One-sided promotional content
- Outdated analysis or statistics
- Shallow listicles without depth
- Content lacking citations or evidence
- Absolute claims without nuance
Real Example: Marketing Automation Query
Query: "Compare marketing automation platforms for enterprise teams"
Claude Response Pattern:
- Provides balanced 4-5 option comparison
- Discusses trade-offs and considerations
- Emphasizes fit for specific contexts
- Includes implementation considerations
Companies That Appeared Most:
- Marketo (71% of queries)
- Pardot (58% of queries)
- HubSpot (54% of queries)
Why These Won:
- Marketo: Recent case studies with specific ROI data
- Pardot: Comparative content addressing Salesforce integration
- HubSpot: Balanced content showing both strengths and limitations
Who Was Invisible:
- Platforms with only promotional content
- Solutions with outdated (pre-2022) comparison pages
- Brands making absolute claims without evidence
Claude Optimization Strategy
Priority Actions:
- Publish comparative content - Your solution vs. alternatives (honestly)
- Update aggressively - Refresh content quarterly minimum
- Show your work - Include data sources, methodology, evidence
- Embrace nuance - Discuss trade-offs and fit, not just benefits
- Build thought leadership - Original research and trend analysis
Timeline: 30-60 days to see initial citations
Effort: Moderate upfront, high maintenance (frequent updates)
Perplexity: The Real-Time Researcher
User Base: 30M monthly active users, 780M+ monthly queries (May 2025) Market Share: 8.2% overall market, 15-20% of U.S. AI search traffic Primary Use Case: Current events, data research, fact-checking, citation-based research Content Preference: Recent, data-rich, specific, timestamped
What Perplexity Actually Rewards
Perplexity behaves like an investigative journalist. It heavily weights recency, values specific data points, and provides direct source attribution visible to users.
Content Types That Win:
- Recent news and updates (last 30 days strongly favored)
- Data-rich reports with specific statistics
- Original research and surveys
- Real-time information (earnings, releases, announcements)
- Specific case studies with quantifiable results
Content That Gets Ignored:
- Evergreen content without update dates
- Generic advice without data
- Dated research (6+ months old)
- Content lacking specific metrics
- Vague claims without evidence
Real Example: AI Search Platform Query
Query: "What are the best AI search optimization platforms in 2025?"
Perplexity Response Pattern:
- Emphasizes recent launches and updates
- Includes specific pricing and feature data
- Shows direct citations to sources
- Prioritizes October 2025 content over June 2025
Companies That Appeared Most:
- New entrants with recent launch announcements
- Platforms with monthly feature releases
- Solutions with publicly shared usage metrics
Why These Won:
- Consistent newsworthy updates
- Publicly shared growth metrics and case studies
- Recent comparative analyses from third parties
- Regular feature announcements and changelogs
Who Was Invisible:
- Established players without recent news
- Platforms with annual (not monthly) content updates
- Companies without public data or metrics
Perplexity Optimization Strategy
Priority Actions:
- Publish frequently - Weekly minimum, daily ideal
- Lead with data - Specific metrics, not generalizations
- Make news - Product updates, partnerships, research
- Include dates - Make publish/update dates prominent
- Be specific - Exact numbers beat approximations
Timeline: 7-14 days to see initial citations
Effort: Low upfront, very high maintenance (constant updates)
The Multi-Platform Reality Check
Here's where most businesses fail: They optimize for one platform and wonder why results are inconsistent.
Platform Overlap Analysis
From my testing, here's how citation overlap actually works:
Companies appearing on ALL three platforms: 12%
Companies appearing on two platforms: 31%
Companies appearing on only one platform: 57%
What this means: Most of your competitors are visible on ONE platform, invisible everywhere else. The winners capture 3x more visibility by optimizing for all three.
Use Case Segmentation
Different buyers use different platforms:
| Buyer Type | Primary Platform | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Evaluators | ChatGPT | Deep research, comparison |
| Executive Decision Makers | Claude | Strategic analysis, trade-offs |
| Active Researchers | Perplexity | Current data, real-time info |
| General Business Users | ChatGPT | Problem-solving, education |
| Analysts & Consultants | Claude + Perplexity | Comprehensive research |
Miss one platform, miss specific buyer segments entirely.
The Unified Optimization Framework
You can't create platform-specific content for everything. Here's a practical framework that scales:
Tier 1: Foundation Content (All Platforms)
Create core pages optimized for all three:
- Homepage - Clear value proposition, comprehensive overview
- Product/service pages - Detailed features, use cases, pricing
- About/team pages - Credibility signals, authority indicators
- Case studies - Specific results with data
- FAQs - Common questions with thorough answers
Optimization: Make comprehensive (ChatGPT), balanced (Claude), and data-rich (Perplexity)
Tier 2: Platform-Weighted Content
Create content with primary platform targets:
For ChatGPT:
- Ultimate guides (monthly)
- Technical documentation (quarterly updates)
- Educational video transcripts
- Problem-solution frameworks
For Claude:
- Comparative analyses (quarterly)
- Industry trend reports (bi-monthly)
- Thought leadership (monthly)
- Methodology explanations
For Perplexity:
- News and announcements (weekly)
- Data reports (monthly)
- Product updates (as released)
- Metrics and benchmarks (real-time)
Tier 3: Monitoring & Iteration
Track these metrics monthly:
- Citation frequency per platform
- Context quality (positive, neutral, negative mentions)
- Competitive share (your mentions vs. competitors)
- Query coverage (% of relevant queries where you appear)
Adjust strategy based on:
- Which platform drives most qualified leads
- Where competitive gaps exist
- Which content types perform best
- Where quick wins are available
Case Study: The Multi-Platform Winner
A B2B SaaS company came to us with strong ChatGPT visibility but zero presence on Claude and Perplexity.
Starting Position:
- ChatGPT: 63% citation rate (industry: CRM)
- Claude: 0% citation rate
- Perplexity: 0% citation rate
- Total market coverage: ~21% (weighted by platform usage)
90-Day Optimization:
Month 1:
- Audited all existing content for platform fit
- Created 5 comparative analyses (Claude-focused)
- Launched monthly data report series (Perplexity-focused)
- Updated all content with publish dates
Month 2:
- Published 8 weekly news updates (Perplexity)
- Created 3 balanced product comparisons (Claude)
- Refreshed outdated guides with 2025 data (ChatGPT)
- Added specific metrics to all case studies
Month 3:
- Scaled to twice-weekly Perplexity updates
- Published quarterly industry analysis (Claude)
- Created platform-specific landing pages
- Built systematic monitoring dashboard
Results After 90 Days:
- ChatGPT: 68% citation rate (+5%)
- Claude: 47% citation rate (+47%)
- Perplexity: 31% citation rate (+31%)
- Total market coverage: ~49% (+28 percentage points)
Business Impact:
- 127% increase in AI-sourced organic leads
- 34% shorter sales cycles (buyers more pre-qualified)
- 3.2x ROI on content investment
The key insight: They didn't abandon ChatGPT strength—they added Claude and Perplexity coverage to capture previously invisible segments.
Your 30-Day Action Plan
Week 1: Audit Current Visibility
- Test 20 relevant queries on each platform
- Document which competitors appear (and how often)
- Note your current citation rate per platform
- Identify biggest gaps vs. competitors
Week 2: Content Assessment
- Evaluate existing content for platform fit
- Identify quick-win optimization opportunities
- Plan 3 new pieces per platform priority
- Set up content calendar for next 90 days
Week 3: Platform-Specific Creation
- Write 1 comprehensive guide (ChatGPT focus)
- Create 1 comparative analysis (Claude focus)
- Publish 2 data-rich updates (Perplexity focus)
- Update 5 existing pages with platform optimization
Week 4: Monitor & Iterate
- Re-test original queries across platforms
- Measure citation rate changes
- Identify which content types performed best
- Plan scaling strategy for winners
The Platform You're Probably Ignoring
Based on my analysis of 100+ businesses, here's the most common gap:
83% are optimizing for ChatGPT
41% are thinking about Claude
12% are optimizing for Perplexity
The opportunity? Perplexity is the easiest to win on right now. Lower competition, clear success patterns, faster results.
The catch? It requires consistent, frequent publishing. Most businesses aren't set up for weekly content updates.
The solution: Start with Perplexity quick wins while building comprehensive ChatGPT content and balanced Claude analysis.
What This Means for Your Business
You have three choices:
Option 1: Single Platform Strategy
Focus all energy on ChatGPT (or Claude, or Perplexity). Capture ~30% of total opportunity. Miss 70% of potential buyers. Watch competitors with multi-platform strategies outpace you.
Option 2: DIY Multi-Platform Optimization
Manually test queries across platforms weekly. Create platform-specific content. Track results in spreadsheets. Invest 15-20 hours weekly staying on top of it. Scale slowly due to resource constraints.
Option 3: Unified AI Visibility Platform
Implement systematic monitoring, optimization, and tracking across all platforms. Get alerts when positioning shifts. Identify opportunities before competitors. Scale efficiently with automation.
The Real Decision
This isn't about whether to optimize for AI search—that ship has sailed. This is about whether you'll capture 30% or 90% of the opportunity.
Every week you optimize for just one platform, competitors are building multi-platform advantages that compound over time.
Take Action Today
Run your own platform test:
- List 10 queries your ideal customers would ask
- Test each one on ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity
- Count how many times you appear vs. competitors
- Calculate your visibility percentage per platform
The math: If you appear in 5/10 ChatGPT queries, 0/10 Claude queries, and 2/10 Perplexity queries, your weighted visibility is ~23%.
Your competitors capturing 60-70%? They're getting 3x your AI-sourced leads.
Want systematic tracking across all platforms? Join the Presence AI waitlist for early access to unified AI visibility monitoring and multi-platform GEO optimization tools. Launch: November 2025.
The platforms are already recommending your competitors.
The question isn't whether to optimize—it's whether you'll settle for one platform or dominate all three.
Data Visualizations & Supporting Materials
To maximize the impact of this analysis, consider creating these data visualizations:
Recommended Infographics
1. Platform Comparison Matrix
- User base statistics (ChatGPT 800M vs Claude 30M vs Perplexity 30M)
- Market share breakdown (82.7% vs 3.2% vs 8.2%)
- Citation timeline comparison (7-14 days vs 30-60 days vs 60-90 days)
- Content type preferences side-by-side
2. Citation Pattern Flow Chart
- Visualization showing the 300% citation variance across platforms
- Overlap diagram: 12% on all three, 31% on two, 57% on one platform only
- Buyer journey mapped to platform preference
3. 90-Day Transformation Timeline
- Visual representation of the case study results
- Month-by-month citation rate improvements
- Content production schedule mapped to platform priorities
4. ROI Calculation Infographic
- 3.2x lead multiplier visualization
- 127% increase in AI-sourced leads
- 34% sales cycle reduction
- Visual breakdown of $5M company example
5. Use Case Segmentation Table
- Enhanced version of the buyer type/platform matrix
- Visual indicators for primary vs secondary platform usage
- Industry-specific recommendations
Interactive Elements
Consider adding:
- Citation rate calculator - Input your current visibility, calculate opportunity gap
- Platform priority quiz - Help businesses identify which platform to start with
- Query testing tool - Framework for running your own 50-query analysis
Note: All statistics and data points in this post are sourced from multiple 2025 industry reports and AI traffic studies. Methodology details available in the Research Methodology section.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: How often should I test my AI platform visibility?
A: Test your core queries monthly at minimum. For competitive industries, weekly testing across all three platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity) helps identify positioning changes before they impact lead volume. Set up automated monitoring to track citation frequency and context quality.
Q: Which AI platform should I prioritize first?
A: Start with ChatGPT if you have (or can create) comprehensive educational content—it holds 82.7% market share with 800M+ weekly users, making it the largest opportunity. Choose Claude if you already publish comparative analysis, have strong B2B/enterprise focus (45% of Claude's traffic is corporate), or target decision-makers who value nuanced analysis. Prioritize Perplexity if you can commit to weekly content updates with specific data—it has the fastest citation timeline (7-14 days) and drives 15-20% of U.S. AI search traffic despite only 8.2% overall market share, indicating high user intent and engagement.
Q: Can I use the same content across all three platforms?
A: Yes for foundation content (homepage, product pages, case studies), but optimize presentation for each platform. Make it comprehensive for ChatGPT, balanced for Claude, and data-rich with prominent dates for Perplexity. Add platform-specific content on top of this foundation.
Q: How long does it take to see AI citation improvements?
A: Timeline varies significantly by platform and content type:
- Perplexity: 7-14 days for new, data-rich content with clear publish dates. We've seen citations appear within 5 days for newsworthy announcements with specific metrics.
- Claude: 30-60 days for comparative analyses and thought leadership. Balanced, evidence-based content typically appears in 4-6 weeks.
- ChatGPT: 60-90 days for comprehensive guides and educational resources. Deep technical documentation may take 3-4 months to gain consistent citations.
Factors that accelerate timeline: Existing domain authority, frequent content updates, specific data points (not generalizations), clear content structure, citations from other authoritative sources. What slows it down: Thin content under 1,000 words, promotional tone, lack of update dates, generic advice without examples. Note: AI traffic grew 527% in Q1 2025, indicating platforms are indexing and citing content more rapidly than even 6 months ago.
Q: What's the biggest mistake in multi-platform AI optimization?
A: Creating thin, promotional content that works on no platform. Each AI system filters promotional content differently. Focus on genuinely helpful, comprehensive content first. Add platform-specific optimization second.
Q: How do I track which AI platform drives actual business results?
A: Use UTM parameters in URLs, ask leads "how did you find us?" in intake forms, and monitor organic direct traffic spikes correlated with AI citations. Track assisted conversions—many buyers research on AI platforms before visiting your site directly.
Q: What content length works best for each platform?
A: ChatGPT favors comprehensive 2,000+ word guides. Claude works well with 1,500-2,500 word balanced analyses. Perplexity rewards focused 800-1,500 word data-rich updates. All platforms value depth over length—avoid filler content.
Q: Should I optimize existing content or create new content first?
A: Start with quick wins on existing high-traffic pages: add dates, include specific data, improve structure, update outdated information. Then create new platform-targeted content. Refreshing 10 existing pages often outperforms creating 3 new ones.
Q: How do AI platforms handle paywalled or gated content?
A: All three platforms primarily cite publicly accessible content. Gated content receives minimal visibility. Make cornerstone educational content freely accessible. Gate advanced tools, templates, or personalized assessments instead.
Q: What role does domain authority play in AI citations?
A: Domain authority matters but less than for traditional SEO. New sites with exceptional, current content can earn Perplexity citations quickly (often within 2 weeks). ChatGPT and Claude weight content quality and comprehensiveness heavily, but established domains have citation advantages due to more extensive training data and external references. Platform-specific impact:
- Perplexity: Lowest authority barrier—focuses heavily on recency and specificity. New domains with data-rich content compete effectively.
- Claude: Moderate authority impact—balanced between authority and content quality.
- ChatGPT: Higher authority influence—established brands and educational institutions have inherent advantages, but comprehensive guides from newer sites can still win.
Strategy: Focus on exceptional content quality first (depth, data, structure), then build authority through earning citations from other authoritative sources. One citation from a high-authority site can accelerate your timeline significantly.
Q: Are there other AI platforms I should optimize for beyond these three?
A: While ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity represent ~90%+ of AI search traffic in 2025, consider:
- Google Gemini/AI Overviews: Integrated into Google Search, massive distribution
- Microsoft Copilot: Enterprise-focused, 14% U.S. market share
- Emerging platforms: Monitor DeepSeek and other regional/specialized AI search tools
Most optimization strategies that work for ChatGPT/Claude/Perplexity translate well to other platforms. Start with the big three, then expand as resources allow. The principles—comprehensive content, balanced analysis, data-rich updates—remain consistent across platforms.
Schema Markup Implementation
Enhance this post's AI visibility with structured data. Implement these schema types:
Article Schema (Required)
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"headline": "ChatGPT vs Claude vs Perplexity: Which AI Recommends Your Competitors?",
"description": "50-query analysis across ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity reveals citation patterns differ by 300%",
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Vladan Ilic",
"url": "https://presenceai.app/about"
},
"datePublished": "2025-10-16",
"dateModified": "2025-11-05",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Presence AI",
"logo": {
"@type": "ImageObject",
"url": "https://presenceai.app/logo.png"
}
}
}
FAQPage Schema (Recommended)
Add FAQ schema for the 11 questions in this post. Example:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How often should I test my AI platform visibility?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Test your core queries monthly at minimum. For competitive industries, weekly testing across all three platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity) helps identify positioning changes before they impact lead volume."
}
}]
}
HowTo Schema (Optional)
For the 30-Day Action Plan section:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "HowTo",
"name": "30-Day AI Platform Optimization Action Plan",
"step": [{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"name": "Week 1: Audit Current Visibility",
"text": "Test 20 relevant queries on each platform, document competitor appearances, note citation rates"
}]
}
Implementation: Add JSON-LD script tags to your page <head>. Use Google's Rich Results Test to validate. Schema improves both traditional SEO (Google) and AI platform extraction (all three platforms can parse structured data more easily).
Tools:
- Schema.org Validator
- Yoast SEO or RankMath for WordPress
- Manual JSON-LD for custom implementations
Sources & References
This analysis draws from multiple 2025 industry reports and studies:
- AI Chatbot Market Share Data: First Page Sage - Top Generative AI Chatbots (October 2025)
- User Statistics: GPTrends - AI Chatbot Usage Statistics mid-2025
- Claude Usage Data: Views4You - 2025 AI Tools Usage Statistics
- Perplexity Statistics: About Chromebooks - Perplexity Statistics And User Trends
- AI Traffic Growth: Superprompt - AI Traffic Surges 527% in 2025
- Platform Comparisons: DataStudios - ChatGPT vs Claude vs Perplexity Full Report
Methodology: Original 50-query testing conducted October 2025. Statistics verified across multiple independent sources. Market share data reflects October 2025 measurements and may change as AI platforms evolve.
Stay Updated: AI platform algorithms, user bases, and citation patterns change rapidly. We update this guide quarterly. Last update: November 5, 2025. Join our newsletter for notification of major updates.
This post reflects analysis and recommendations as of November 2025. AI platform behavior evolves continuously—test your specific queries monthly for current visibility patterns.
About the Author
Vladan Ilic
Founder and CEO